2 Chronicles 1 Kings Versus

2 Chronicles v. 1 Kings The editor of this blog has received several comments where he notes that the Bible, in their capacity of "book of divine inspiration" is inerrant, ie no errors, just as point in the book in question there are no contradictions.

In this post, we confront two books, The Bible, which are considered "historic" 2 Chronicles, versus 1 Kings, in them we find some verses that refer to issues related to the Temple of Solomon, and esoscapítulos / appreciate verses errors / inconsistencies.

When we make a proposition or statement, and then do another that is opposed to the first, we incurred contradiction.

The contradictions to which we will refer the find, as already noted, in 2 Chronicles and 1 Kings, we are aware that they are two different books, written at different times and different authors (both anonymous), but both books found in one: The Bible, a book that is "inerrant" as his followers, so it should not contain such nonsense since that is "divinely inspired".

How many were the supervisors who worked on the construction of the Temple of Solomon?

Three 1600

2 Chronicles 2:2

2 .- then recruited to 70,000 magazines, and 80,000 beds in the mountainous region since 3600 supervisors.

Three 1300

1 Kings 5:16

16 .- without the principal officers who were over Solomon's work, three in 1300, which were responsible for the people who did the work.

What was the capacity, in baths, which had the sea of ​​brass?

Three thousand

2 Chronicles 4:5

5 .- The source was a handbreadth thick, and its rim was like the brim of a cup or a lily flower. It had a capacity of 3,000 baths.

Two thousand

1 Kings 7:26

26 .- The bulk of the sea was a handbreadth, and the edge was wrought like the brim of a cup or fleur de lis, and could accommodate him two thousand baths.

The chapters / verses discussed in this opportunity does not leave room for interpretation, speculation, make reference to quantities, numbers.

It is obvious that someone made a mistake, does the translator?, Is the writer?, Is the author?.

Whether the author is wrong, the translator or transcriber, it is clear that there is contradiction.

Starting from the premise (uncertain), one of the propositions is true we conclude that the other is not, therefore it is a mistake, a lie, putting into question the much vaunted "inerrant" Bible.

The editor of this blog is not intended in any way that readers set aside their beliefs, their faith.

"The Bible Lies" is standard, and so we state in the header of the blog, tolerance, respect for the beliefs of everyone, but when we find,

And we must see that we have found!,

lies, contradictions, inconsistencies, contradictions and / or aberrations in the book noted as "divine inspiration", we feel compelled to make them public, and will continue.

This article was taken from The Bible Lies blog whose URL is: http://labibliamentiras.blogspot.com